Peer Review Process
The journal operates a double-anonymous peer-review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain unidentified throughout the evaluation. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise and are expected to provide thorough, constructive, and objective assessments that enhance the scholarly quality and contribution of each manuscript.
Mission
The mission of the peer-review process is to uphold the highest standards of academic rigor, quality, and excellence in scholarly research and publication.
Vision
The journal’s vision is to provide an inclusive platform for scholars and professionals to share innovative, diverse, and critical perspectives that advance knowledge in the field.
Values
The journal values intellectual diversity and respectful scholarly dialogue. Reviewers are drawn from a wide range of institutions, disciplines, and professional backgrounds worldwide and are expected to deliver critical, constructive, and ethical feedback to authors.
Ethics
All manuscripts, review invitations, and reviewer reports are treated as strictly confidential. Reviewers must not disclose, share, or discuss any aspect of the review process or manuscript content with others without explicit permission from the editors. This obligation of confidentiality continues even after publication.
